🔍 Filtered
🎣 Engagement Bait
This content appears to be fishing for engagement without substantive analysis.
Analysis:
Content fails engagement_bait check. The piece builds up a research finding but ends with a leading question designed to prompt engagement rather than provide substantive analysis: 'If your organisation is deploying autonomous agents for complex reasoning today, have you accounted for the fact that your most capable models are also the most likely to fail unpredictably?' This is a standalone prompt for engagement without follow-up analysis or actionable guidance.
Flagged phrases:
- • "Closing rhetorical question with no context or follow-up"
- • "Low-effort engagement prompt: 'have you accounted for...'"
- • "No substantive resolution or actionable insights after raising the concern"
💡 Suggestion: Add meaningful analysis, data, or personal experience to accompany your question or statement. Instead of just asking "Agree?", explain WHY you think something is important.